These people, of anyone, need to hold gold...

You are receiving this message because you have specifically subscribed to Golden Opportunities, have purchased a product or have registered for a conference with us or with one of our partners. If you'd rather not receive emails from us, please click the link at the bottom of this page to unsubscribe from our database. Remember your personal information will never be rented or sold and you may unsubscribe at any time.

Contact Us | Privacy Policy | View in Browser | Forward to a Friend

Eat Your Own Cooking

Why do gold and silver mining companies continue to put their cash into currencies instead of metals?

It’s a good day to venture into some other thoughts on the metals.

Gold is flat today, losing some early-session gains as investors continue to ponder and price in the Fed’s first rate cut next week.
 

Tech stocks are rebounding, sending the U.S. stock indices upward, while gold is battling a stronger dollar and rising Treasury yields.

With not much going on in the metals, it’s a good time to share with you some thoughts recently penned by my friend Stefan Gleason, CEO of Money Metals Exchange and a seasoned seasoned business leader, investor, political strategist, and grassroots activist.

Stefan is a leading voice in the retail bullion industry, and has shared his views on CNN, FoxNews, and CNBC and in hundreds of publications such as the Wall Street Journal, TheStreet and Seeking Alpha.

He’s also the driving force behind the Sound Money Defense League, which is working on state levels to restore gold and silver as America’s Constitutional money. In fact, I’m starting to work with Stefan on a broader effort to do the same on a federal level.

With that background, you won’t be surprised to learn that Stefan is part of a movement, along with Chris Ritchie, president of SilverCrest Metals, to encourage gold and silver mining companies to hold bullion instead of dollars in their cash accounts.

Who better to understand the advantages of monetary metals over fiat currencies than those who are literally digging the money out of the ground?

Stefan recently penned a wonderful article on his site explaining this concept, and I thought you’d enjoy it. It’s reprinted below with his permission.

— BL

Holding Gold Yields Better Returns Than Mining for It

By Stefan Gleason

With spot gold prices at record highs, investors might expect that shares of precious metals mining companies are also trading at record highs.

By and large, that is not the case.

Mining stocks, as represented by the HUI Gold BUGS Index, are still underwater by more than 40% compared to their 2011 highs. And that’s despite being pulled up significantly this year by soaring gold and silver prices.

There are a variety of reasons why most mining shares have lagged the metals. First and foremost, mining is a tough business that is fraught with risks. Even when the value of a mine’s end product goes up, the costs of getting it out of the ground can go up even faster.

During periods when market prices for metals fall below a mining company’s all-in sustaining costs, it may choose to sell at a loss. That’s because it would be impractical for a mine to lay off all its workers and let its expensive equipment sit idle while waiting for market conditions to improve.

But there is another option available to precious metals mining companies during times when their product is being undervalued.

If the CEOs of companies that have “gold” (or silver) in their name truly believe in their product – which is money itself – then why don’t they hold some of it on their books as a reserve asset instead of immediately exchanging it for dollars regardless of prevailing price? 

Gold is considered by the Bank for International Settlements to be a “Tier 1” asset within the banking system. That means it is globally recognized as a high-quality capital reserve asset.

Central bankers around the world agree.  Despite refusing to make their fiat currencies redeemable in gold, central banks have been accumulating the monetary metal at a blistering pace over the past few years.

But with a few exceptions, large corporations — including major gold and silver producers — have failed to bolster their own finances with sound money backing.

SilverCrest Metals Sets An Example

One company that actually does is Canada-based SilverCrest Metals. Under the leadership of President Christopher Ritchie, SilverCrest has added some $30 million in gold and silver bullion to its balance sheet, which represents nearly 30% of its treasury assets.

With the benefit of a fantastic producing mine, SilverCrest began accumulating its precious metal reserves right after paying off all its debts over a year ago. As the nominal price of gold has risen 30% over the past year, this strategy is already looking like a pretty genius move.

Plenty of other publicly traded companies regularly engage in stock buybacks.

CEOs who believe in the underlying strength of their business are happy to have the company buy back its own shares during periods when they are trading at a discount. Share buybacks often do a far better service to shareholders than holding depreciating cash, issuing taxable dividends, or deploying capital into riskier projects.

Last year, Berkshire Hathaway, helmed by legendary value investor Warren Buffett, bought back $9.2 billion of its own shares. Buffett eats his own cooking.

Unfortunately, however, the typical mining industry executive does not.

Gold Holdings Can Buffer a Company's Ups And Downs

Mining leaders have overlooked golden opportunities to buy back their own product when it was ridiculously cheap and hold it on their balance sheet. Instead, they myopically opted to trade it for a relative pittance in dollars that they thought would look better on their quarterly earnings reports.

Throughout its history, the mining industry as a whole has been such a poor steward of investor capital that it has earned a bad reputation on Wall Street. Negative sentiment toward the industry has, in turn, contributed to share price underperformance.

Of course, with gold recently darting to a record high price above $2,500 an ounce, industry executives might feel that now would be a poor time to make such a move.

Given the current momentum and array of bullish factors driving bullion, we doubt that will prove to be the case.

But even if they think the market price of the yellow metal is currently too elevated, at least in nominal terms, what’s their excuse for not retaining its much cheaper cousin, silver?

Even at $30 per ounce, silver remains well below its previous all-time high near the $50 level. Silver is, by many measures, undervalued – especially when considering the potential for rapidly growing sources of industrial demand to outstrip supply.

Taking concrete action that demonstrates a belief in their product will help gold and silver mining industry leaders break the cycle of share underperformance.

CLICK HERE
To Learn More About This Year’s
Blockbuster 50th Anniversary
New Orleans Conference

CLICK HERE to watch interviews by Brien Lundin and Kai Hoffmann with many of today's most exciting junior mining companies on the

Gold Newsletter Youtube channel.